植物3d规格编辑器在我使用它的10年里没有更新过。它需要彻底检修。1)目录编辑器-自定义属性应该能够轻松地跨组件类型和部件类别添加。2)在Spec编辑器中,我们应该能够搜索和过滤组件目录中的任何数据字段,以及自定义和保存我们在UI中的默认搜索设置。(包括所有端口数据)3)在高级编辑表中自定义字段的能力。(包括所有港口数据)4)“在目录中查找”按钮实际在目录编辑器UI中查找。5)能够分裂规格和目录编辑器在不同的窗口/屏幕。6)能够将高级编辑表分割到不同的窗口/屏幕。关于1,2,3)当前的UI限制我们只有12个字段列。 Size Range Long Description (Family) Short Description Material Material Code End Type Facing Pressure Class Schedule Design Std Design Pressure Factor Manufacturer If we go to the trouble of adding "Flange Std" data to every valve or flange in our catalogs, when we want to add particular components to the spec we are unable search or filter by the "Flange Std" in the spec editor UI to differentiate them and bring them into the spec. This simple limitation is forcing P3D administrators to put multiple fields of data into the 12 searchable fields above. OR if they see the fundamental problem with putting multiple data into single data fields, they may not bother to fill in the Flange Std data in the first place. Either way, the end result is Plant 3d BIM data being either corrupted or lacking detail, simply because of the users requirement to work around the software's limitations and restrictions. Whether Plant 3d users acknowledge this or not. I see an overhaul of the Spec Editor as fundamental and extremely important for the future of Plant 3d. Why? Because the world is moving at light speed towards connected data. In order to connect data to other data it needs to... a) Exist b) Be consistent. c) Be Clean If Autodesk keep preventing their customers from achieving these fundamental data requirements, simply because they don't want to spend any money improving something that hasn't been updated for more than 10 years, I have no doubt Autocad Plant 3d Software will be overtaken by competition very soon.
显示更多